The Shaping Academy for Behavioral Health Development, Inc. v. Aetna Behavioral Health, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 1:25-cv-23640-DPG
THE SHAPING ACADEMY
FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
a Florida profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH LLC,
a foreign limited liability company,
Defendant.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Omnibus Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder (the “Report”), [ECF No. 43], on Plaintiff’s Emergency
Motion for Temporary Injunctive Relief and Temporary Preliminary Injunction (“Motion for
Preliminary Injunction”), [ECF No. 1-5], and Defendant Aetna Behavioral Health LLC’s
(“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Arbitration, [ECF No. 6]. On November 14, 2025, Judge Shaw-
Wilder issued her Report recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction be
denied, Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration be granted, and that the case be stayed pending
arbitration. [ECF No. 43]. Neither party objected to the Report.
A 	district 	court 	may 	accept, 	reject, 	or 	modify 	a 	magistrate 	judge’s 	report 	and
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The objected portions of the report and recommendation
are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party
disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ.
______________________________/
Case 1:25-cv-23640-DPG Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 1 of 2

P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made
are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C.,
199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781,
784 (11th Cir. 2006). As neither party objected to the Report, the Court reviewed it for clear error.
Finding no clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Shaw-Wilder’s well-reasoned analysis and
conclusions.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) 	The Omnibus Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 43], is ADOPTED in full.
(2) 	Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, [ECF No. 1-5], is DENIED.
(3) 	Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, [ECF No. 6], is GRANTED.
(4) 	The case shall be STAYED and CLOSED pending arbitration. The parties shall
notify the Court of the arbitration’s outcome within 30 days of its conclusion.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 5th day of December 2025.
________________________________
DARRIN P. GAYLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-23640-DPG Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2025 Page 2 of 2