1:25-cv-02786•PANTCHEV
Texte intégral
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUEORGUI HRISTOV PANTCHEV, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2786 (UNA) ) MOLLY C. DWYER, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Memorandum Opinion This matter is before the court on initial review of Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and pro se complaint, ECF No. 1. The court will grant the application, and for the reasons discussed below, dismiss the complaint without prejudice. “A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” is frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). And the court cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint. Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536–37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (explaining that courts may dismiss cases “for patent insubstantiality,” including where plaintiff allegedly “was subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment deriving from uncertain origins”). Consequently, a court is obligated to dismiss a complaint as frivolous “when Case 1:25-cv-02786-UNA Document 8 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2 the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible.” Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). The complaint consists of scattered insults and inflammatory language. Its allegations are conclusory and lack any factual basis. The complaint is frivolous, and therefore must be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. DATE: April 13, 2026 AMIR H. ALI United States District Judge Case 1:25-cv-02786-UNA Document 8 Filed 04/13/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.