White v. Taylor

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
In re
FANNIE MARY TAYLOR,
Debtor.
____________________________
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WHITE,
Trustee,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES LEROY TAYLOR,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 05-00681
(Chapter 7)
Adversary Proceeding No.
05-10081
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
The plaintiff has filed a Motion to Amend Scheduling Order
(Docket Entry (“DE”) No. 13). 	The defendant has opposed the
motion. 	The motion fails to state any grounds for granting the
motion, and thus violates LBR 9013-1(b)(1) (“All motions shall
state with particularity the grounds therefor . . . .”).
Accordingly, the motion does not warrant setting a hearing. 	It
is thus
The Decision and Order below is hereby signed.
Dated: January 8, 2007.
_____________________________
S. Martin Teel, Jr.
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 05-10081 Doc 15 Filed 01/08/07 Entered 01/08/07 15:04:20 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 2

2	C:\Documents and Settings\teel\My Documents\White vs Jas Taylor (In re Fannie Mary Taylor) Decsn & Order Denying Mtn to Amend Scheduling Order.wpd
ORDERED that the Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is DENIED
without prejudice to the filing of a motion that alleges
sufficient grounds to justify amending the scheduling order.
[Signed and dated above.]
Copies to: All counsel of record; Office of United States
Trustee.
Case 05-10081 Doc 15 Filed 01/08/07 Entered 01/08/07 15:04:20 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 2