USA v. King et al

1:24-cr-00251Cod24 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Criminal Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR-6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
6. 	BRADLEY EDSON,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TRAVEL
Susan Prose, United States Magistrate Judge
This case is before the court on Defendant Bradley Edson’s Unopposed Motion for Leave
to Travel, ECF No. 191 (the “Motion”) after it was referred by District Judge Regina M.
Rodriguez, ECF No. 193. Defendant is on pretrial release and subject to conditions that restrict
his travel absent prior court approval. ECF No. 66 at 2. He now seeks permission to travel from
Phoenix, Arizona, to Telluride, Colorado, from December 22, 2025, through December 30, 2025,
for a holiday trip. Mot. ¶¶ 1, 3–7.
The Motion represents that the government does not oppose the requested travel and that
Defendant’s supervising pretrial services officer will confirm Defendant’s compliance with his
bond conditions before departure and will supervise his compliance with all reporting and check-
in requirements during the trip. Mot. ¶¶ 10–13.
Finding good cause, the court GRANTS the Motion. Defendant may travel from
Phoenix, Arizona, to Telluride, Colorado, from December 22, 2025, through December 30, 2025,
Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR Document 194 filed 11/24/25 USDC Colorado pg 1
of 2
2
provided that the following conditions are met:
1. 	Defendant is compliant with all conditions of release and with all instructions
from the Probation/Pretrial Services Office at the time of travel. He must confer
with his supervising pretrial services officer the day before his departure, and
travel is authorized only if the officer confirms Defendant’s compliance and
approves the trip at that time;
2. 	Before leaving Phoenix, Defendant provides his supervising pretrial services
officer 	with 	all 	travel 	details, 	including 	flight 	reservations, 	rental 	car
arrangements, lodging information, and telephone contact information where
he may be reached for the duration of his trip; and
3. 	Defendant checks in with his supervising pretrial services officer as and when
directed during his travel.
In all other respects, Defendant remains subject to the previously-imposed conditions of release.
See ECF No. 66.
DATED: November 24, 2025 	BY THE COURT:
Susan Prose
United States Magistrate Judge
Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR Document 194 filed 11/24/25 USDC Colorado pg 2
of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.