3:26-cv-01584•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Texte intégral
1 26-CV-1584-GPC-AHG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GERARDO PINEDA-MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, et al., Respondents. Case No.: 26-CV-1584-GPC-AHG ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [ECF No. 1] Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the Petition and ORDERS that Respondents provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven (7) days. BACKGROUND Petitioner is a citizen and national of Mexico who entered the United States without inspection on or about February 12, 2022. ECF No. 1 (“Pet.”) ¶ 1. He resided in the interior of the United States continuously since then. Id. ¶ 30. On February 17, 2026, as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) officers were attempting to locate another individual, they stopped Petitioner’s vehicle. Id. ¶ 44. He was a passenger of the vehicle and not the individual being sought by the officers. Id. The ICE officers detained Petitioner Case 3:26-cv-01584-GPC-AHG Document 5 Filed 03/20/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 3
2 26-CV-1584-GPC-AHG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in National City, California. Id. ¶ 43. He was subsequently transferred to the Otay Mesa Detention Center, where he remains detained. Id. ¶ 45. Petitioner alleges that his detention without a bond hearing violates his Fifth Amendment due process rights and the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Id. ¶¶ 47-55. Specifically, Petitioner argues that his detention is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) rather than § 1225(b)(2). Id. ¶¶ 48-49. Petitioner requests an order requiring his release, an order for a constitutionally adequate bond hearing in the alternative, or any other relief this Court deems proper. Id. at 11-12. Respondents have filed a notice of non-opposition as to a bond hearing for Petitioner. ECF No. 3. Thus, Respondents have “effectively concede[ed]” that Petitioner is detained under § 1226(a) rather than § 1225(b)(2) and has been unlawfully denied a bond hearing. See Vardanyan v. Noem, No. 5:26-CV-00423-MRA-RAO, 2026 WL 383341, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2026). DISCUSSION Given Petitioner’s allegations, a bond hearing is the appropriate remedy in this case. Section 1226 requires only consideration of release on bond, and a bond hearing is therefore sufficient to correct the unopposed violations outlined in the Petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a); Garcia v. Noem, 803 F. Supp. 3d 1064, 1078 (S.D. Cal. 2025) (finding a bond hearing, rather than release, to be the appropriate remedy where Petitioner was wrongfully subjected to mandatory detention without a hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) rather than provided a bond hearing under § 1226(a)); Esquivel-Ipina v. LaRose, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 2998361, at *6 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2025) (same). If Respondents fail to comply with this order, Petitioner may seek further relief from the Court at that time. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows: • Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven (7) days of this Order; Case 3:26-cv-01584-GPC-AHG Document 5 Filed 03/20/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 3
3 26-CV-1584-GPC-AHG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • Respondents are ORDERED to FILE a Notice of Compliance within seven (7) days of the hearing confirming that Petitioner was provided with a bond hearing and stating whether Petitioner was released on bond; • Respondents SHALL NOT deny Petitioner’s bond on the basis that 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) requires mandatory detention; • Respondents SHALL NOT transfer Petitioner from this district pending his bond hearing; • The Clerk of Court SHALL enter judgment in Petitioner's favor and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2026 Case 3:26-cv-01584-GPC-AHG Document 5 Filed 03/20/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 3 of 3
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.