Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

1
26cv1471 DMS MSB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EVELIO JAVIER SILVESTRE-
SILVESTRE,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER J. LA ROSE, Senior
Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center;
DANIEL A. BRIGHTMAN, San Diego
Field Office Director, Immigration and
Customs Enforcement and Removal
Operations (“ICE/ERO”); TODD M.
LYONS, Acting Director of Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”); U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security; U.S.
Department of Homeland Security; and
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General of
the United States,
Respondent.
Case No.: 26cv1471 DMS MSB
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
On March 9, 2026, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28
U.S.C. § 2241. Respondents shall file their response to the Petition on or before March
Case 3:26-cv-01471-DMS-MSB Document 2 Filed 03/10/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2

2
26cv1471 DMS MSB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17, 2026. Petitioner shall file his reply on or before March 20, 2026. Unless the Court
orders otherwise, the matter will be submitted on the papers without oral argument.
To maintain the status quo, Respondent, his officers, agents, servants, employees,
attorneys, and other persons who act in concert or participation with Respondent
MUST NOT transfer Petitioner outside the Southern District of California pending the
Court’s resolution of the Petition. See Doe v. Bondi, Case No.: 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025
WL 1870979 at *1 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2025) (“Federal courts retain jurisdiction to preserve
the status quo while determining whether [they have] subject matter jurisdiction over a case
and while a petition is pending resolution from the court.”) (collecting cases).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 10, 2026
Case 3:26-cv-01471-DMS-MSB Document 2 Filed 03/10/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2