3:26-cv-01391•Yue v. LaRose
Texte intégral
1 26-cv-1391-JO-DDL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BENXING YUE, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, et al., Respondents. Case No.: 26-cv-1391-JO-DDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE In the interest of “efficient administration of the judicial business of the district,” see Civ. L.R. 40.1(a), and because the Court concludes that this case is related to Yue v. Noem, et al., 26-cv-1328-JES-SBC (S.D. Cal. 2025), the Court directs the Clerk to immediately reassign this case to Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. See Badea v. Cox, 931 F.2d 573, 575 (9th Cir. 1991) (“District court judges have broad discretion regarding the assignment or reassignment of cases.”) (cleaned up); In re Marshall, 721 F.3d 1032, 1040 (9th Cir. 2013) (“[J]udges are vested with inherent authority to transfer cases among themselves for the expeditious administration of justice.”) (cleaned up). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2026 _____________________________ Hon. Jinsook Ohta United States District Judge Dated: March 9, 2026 _____________________________ Hon. James E. Simmons, Jr. United States District Judge Case 3:26-cv-01391-JES-DDL Document 2 Filed 03/09/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.