USA v. Osuna

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 	26-cr-00482-H
Plaintiff,
vs.
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Joshua Osuna
Defendant.
IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:
X
X
Remand U.S. Court of Appeals, Previously Imposed Sentence is Hereby Set Aside and
Vacated, and case is dismissed.
an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has
granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or
the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or
the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment: 21:84l(a); 18:2- Possession ofMethamphetam with
Intent to Distribute (Felony); Aiding and Abetting
IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.
Dated 	3/17 /26
Case 3:26-cr-00482-H Document 26 Filed 03/17/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of
1