Brar v. Apple Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TANBEER SINGH BRAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-cv-07112-EKL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
Plaintiff’s complaint and amended complaint, ECF Nos. 1, 14, were previously dismissed
by the Court, ECF Nos. 9, 21. After dismissing the first amended complaint, the Court set a
deadline of December 22, 2025, for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 21.
On December 22, 2025, the Court extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file his second amended
complaint to January 14, 2026. ECF No. 26. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed
his second amended complaint.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than March 9,
2026, why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b). Alternatively, Plaintiff may file his second amended complaint by March 9, 2026.
If Plaintiff fails to do so, the action may be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2026
______________________________________
EUMI K. LEE
United States District Judge
Case 5:25-cv-07112-EKL Document 28 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 1