In Re: Dropbox Sign Data Breach Litigation

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: DROPBOX SIGN DATA BREACH
LITIGATION
Case No. 24-cv-02637-JSW
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Re: Dkt. No. 68
Now before the Court is the motion filed by Plaintiffs for leave to file a motion for
reconsideration.
Reconsideration is appropriate where “the district court (1) is presented with newly
discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3)
there is an intervening change in controlling law.” County of Santa Clara v. Trump, 267 F. Supp.
3d 1201, 1207 (N.D. Cal. 2017). Plaintiffs proffer that there has been a change in law reflected in
Godun v. JustAnswer LLC, 135 F.4th 699 (9th Cir. 2025). The Court finds that there has been an
intervening change in controlling law that may alter the legal analysis of whether Dropbox users
manifested unambiguous assent to its Terms of Service.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for
reconsideration. Plaintiffs may file such a motion and set it for hearing on an available date on the
Court’s regular calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 20, 2026
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
Case 4:24-cv-02637-JSW Document 72 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1