Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia, Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TANGLE INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARITZIA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-01196-JSW
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Re: Dkt. No. 103
Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of
the Court’s Order dated October 3, 2025, dismissing Aritzia Inc. for lack of personal jurisdiction.
After reviewing the filing, opposition, and supplementary materials, the Court finds that there is
not newly discovered evidence or grounds for reconsideration. Evidence of macromanagement
does not equate to direction of day-to-day operations or a disregard for separate corporate
formalities. See, e.g., Ranza v. Nike, Inc., 793 F.3d 1059, 1075 (9th Cir. 2015). The Court
DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 12. 2026
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
Case 4:23-cv-01196-JSW Document 119 Filed 01/12/26 Page 1 of 1