Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

4:16-cv-05544Cand18 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG
Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class
Michael Rubin (SBN 80618)
Matthew Murray (SBN 271461)
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: 	(415) 421-7151
Facsimile: 	(415) 362-8064
Email: 	mrubin@altber.com
mmurray@altber.com
Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683)
Keith Ehrman (SBN 106985)
MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
535 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: 	(415) 421-9292
Facsimile: 	(415) 403-0202
Email: 	cp@mhpsf.com
keith@mhpsf.com
William B. Reilly (SBN 177550)
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY
86 Molino Avenue
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Telephone: 	(415) 225-6215
Facsimile: 	(415) 634-2897
Email: 	bill@williambreilly.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(Counsel for Defendants listed on the next page)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and
WILLIAM COPLIN, an individual, on behalf
of themselves and on behalf of others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY
INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL
CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL
CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE
GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an
employee benefit plan,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:16-CV-05544-HSG
CLASS ACTION
LOCAL RULE 6-2 STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING AND
HEARING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS (as
modified)
(Current) Hearing Date: December 18, 2025 at
2:00 p.m.
Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG
Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800
Mark G. Kisicki, Esq. (CA SBN 150057)
mark.kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com
Elizabeth M. Soveranez (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice
elizabeth.soveranez@ogletreedeakins.com
Esplanade Center III, Suite 800
2415 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Tel.: 602.778.3700
Fax: 602.778.3750
Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45) admitted pro hac vice
56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Tel.: 219.242.8668
Fax: 219.242.8669
mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com
Erika L. Leonard (GA SBN 565965) admitted pro hac vice
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1150
Austin, TX 78701
Tel.: 512.344.4700
Fax: 512.344.4701
erika.leonard@ogletree.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 	Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG
Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class
STIPULATION TO REVISE BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS
The parties hereby stipulate and jointly ask the Court to order the following revised
schedule for briefing and hearing on Defendants’ recently filed Motion to Decertify Class (ECF
218):
- 	Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Decertify the Class shall be due December 19,
2025;
- 	Defendants’ Reply shall be due January 9, 2026;
- 	The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class shall be reset to January 22,
2026. Counsel arguing the motion shall appear in person, while other counsel may
appear remotely.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, in support of this stipulated change in deadlines, the parties
state as follows:
On November 13, 2025, Defendants filed a Motion to Decertify Class and noticed it for the
next available hearing date on the Court’s calendar, December 18, 2025. ECF 218. Under the
default schedule for noticed motions, Plaintiffs’ opposition would be due on Friday, November 28,
2025, the day after Thanksgiving. ECF 218; LR 7-3(a).
Plaintiffs’ counsel have pre-scheduled travel and time out of the office the full week of
Thanksgiving. They also have many other pressing deadlines in this and other cases in the coming
weeks, including a December 8, 2025 deadline to respond to Defendants’ petition for writ of
certiorari to the Supreme Court in this case. These holiday plans and other deadlines together made
it infeasible for counsel to prepare and file an opposition to the motion to decertify by the day after
Thanksgiving, and Plaintiffs’ counsel therefore reached out to counsel for Defendants to propose a
stipulation to extend their opposition deadline by three weeks, to December 19, 2025, to allow
adequate time to prepare a response.
Defendants agreed to Plaintiffs’ request and requested in turn that, given the winter
holidays, their reply deadline be extended to January 9, 2026. Plaintiffs have agreed.
To account for this revised briefing schedule, and subject to the Court’s approval, the
parties have agreed to reset the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify to January 22, 2026.
Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 3 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 	Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG
Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class
Counsel arguing the motion are available to attend in person. At least one counsel from Defendants
who will not be arguing the motion requests permission to attend remotely, given scheduling and
travel constraints.
The parties have previously stipulated and filed unopposed motions to modify various
briefing schedules in this case. ECF 20, 21, 36, 37, 78, 79, 141, 142. There have been no prior
modifications of the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Decertify.
The stipulated revision to the briefing and hearing schedule will not otherwise affect the
schedule in this case, as the trial has not yet been set.
Dated: November 17, 2025 	Respectfully submitted,
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
MICHAEL RUBIN
MATTHEW J. MURRAY
MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
CLIFF PALEFSKY
KEITH EHRMAN
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY
WILLIAM REILLY
By: /s/ Michael Rubin
Michael Rubin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki (with permission)
Mark G. Kisicki
Elizabeth M. Soveranez
2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Mark Schmidtke
56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Erika L. Leonard
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1150
Austin, TX 78701
Attorneys for Defendants
Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 	Case No. 4:16-cv-05544-HSG
Stipulation to Revise Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class
Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) E-Signature Attestation
I attest that each of the other Signatories have concurred in the filing of this document.
/s/ Michael Rubin
Michael Rubin
Order
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Counsel who will not argue the
motion may appear remotely via Public Zoom Webinar. Counsel may access the webinar
information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/hsg.
Date: 11/18/2025 THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
Case 4:16-cv-05544-HSG Document 220 Filed 11/18/25 Page 5 of 5

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.