3:26-cv-03136•Ng v. United Financial Casualty Company
Texte intégral
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAK LUN NG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 26-cv-03136-LJC ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 43 The Court issued an order of dismissal (ECF No. 41) and the Clerk entered judgment for Defendant (ECF No. 42) on September 28, 2026. Plaintiff has filed a “Reply” arguing that the Court’s Order was erroneous, which might also be intended as a motion for leave to amend, for reconsideration, or to alter or amend judgment. To the extent Plaintiff seeks such relief, it is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court’s previous Order. To the extent Plaintiff’s filing purports to notice a hearing for October 15, 2026, that hearing is VACATED. The Court will not respond to any further motions challenging matters previously decided or seeking to reopen this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2026 LISA J. CISNEROS United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:26-cv-03136-LJC Document 44 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.