City and County of San Francisco v. City of Oakland

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Plaintiff,
v.
PORT OF OAKLAND,
Defendant.
Case No. 24-cv-02311-TSH
ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 117
In ECF No. 117, the Port of Oakland filed a motion to consider whether documents
designated as confidential by United Airlines should be filed under seal. The motion contains a
certificate of service stating that it was served on United. Under Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3),
United had seven days to file a statement or declaration to support the sealing request. The rule
further provides that “[a] failure to file a statement or declaration may result in the unsealing of the
provisionally sealed document without further notice to the Designating Party.” More than seven
days have passed, and United has filed nothing. Accordingly, the sealing motion is DENIED and
the Court ORDERS the Port to file the documents at issue in the public record no sooner than five
days and no later than ten days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 20, 2025
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:24-cv-02311-TSH Document 121 Filed 11/20/25 Page 1 of 1