4:09-bk-47577•Multiple Allied Services, Inc
Texte intégral
Entered on Docket October 15, 2010 GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case: 09-47577 Doc# 168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 1 of 3
Case: 09-47577 Doc# 168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 2 of 3
Case: 09-47577 Doc# 168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 3 of 3
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Entered on Docket October 15, 2010 GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FILED OCT 15 2010 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT GAN FRANCISCO, GA 5% UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT to oO SN HW WwW F W NY FF FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA » i=) In re Case No. 09-47577 RLE e | MULTIPLE ALLIED SERVICES, INC., dba MIRACLE AUTO PAINTING, Chapter 7 YP FP » WwW N ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor. » uw ay fea) MEMORANDUM RE KAYLAND OF SACRAMENTO, LLC’S MOTION TO FIX THE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DUE AS ADMINISTRATIVE RENT re oR oO ~l Landlord is entitled to an administrative claim for all legal rary \o services performed from the petition date until the leasehold was Ny i=) surrendered on January 22, 2010. The court determines the amount N = of such fees to be $28,066. iS N The lease was deemed rejected on December 17, 2009, when iS) Ww Debtor failed to assume it within 120 days after the filing of the 24|/petition. 11 U.S.C. § 365(d) (4). 25 Although section 365(d) (4) requires Debtor to surrender the 26llpremises immediately upon rejection, Judge Jellen determined that 27||Debtor did not surrender the premises before it was ordered to do 28 ]/so on January 22, 2010. MEMORANDUM RE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DUE AS ADMINISTRATIVE RENT -1- us coversex Ege, O9-47577 Doc#168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 1 of INFORMATION GPO 3 oO Oo SJ HD W fF W DY Ff Rr o 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ca Landlord and Trustee stipulated on March 4, 2010 that Landlord’s administrative claim included unpaid rent from the petition date through date of actual surrender of the premises (rather than the date of deemed rejection), and that “rent” for such period included any contractual obligation to pay attorneys fees (the Stipulation). Trustee argues that, but for the Stipulation, Landlord could recover only those fees incurred between the petition date and the date of rejection. Cukierman v. Uecker (In re Cukierman), 265 F.3d 846, 852 (9th Cir. 2001). Trustee seeks to be relieved of the Stipulation on three grounds: mistake; lack of notice to creditors; and lack of consideration. Mistake is not a sufficient basis to set aside the Stipulation, because the mistake was neither mutual nor caused by Landlord. The Stipulation stated very clearly that Landlord could recover attorneys fees incurred through the date of surrender. Lack of notice to creditors is not a sufficient basis to set aside the Stipulation, because the court declines to permit Trustee to attack his own act as ultra vires, especially where that act was not a settlement of all issues, but merely a narrowing of issues for a final hearing. Lack of consideration is also not a sufficient basis to set aside the Stipulation. By narrowing the issues to be resolved at a final hearing, the Stipulation provided a benefit to the estate by reducing the estate’s litigation costs. At the same time, it is also far from clear that the Stipulation gave away a valid defense to a claim for fees incurred between rejection and surrender. Debtor’s failure to surrender the premises upon rejection violated Debtor’s duties under section MEMORANDUM RE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DUE AS ADMINISTRATIVE RENT -2- e: 09-47577 Doc#168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 2 of 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ca 365(d) (4), which gave rise to an administrative claim for damages caused by that violation. see In re Malden Mills Industries, Inc., 303 B.R. 688 (lst Cir. BAP 2004); see also In re TSB, Inc., 302 B.R. 84 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2003). The attorneys fees provision in the lease makes all fees incurred by Landlord to enforce its rights under the lease payable immediately as rent. The services performed from the petition date though the date of surrender meet that criterion. The lease provision does not limit the amount payable to reasonable fees (although it also appears that the amounts sought are reasonable). It thus appears that all attorneys fees incurred from the petition date through the date of surrender constitute an allowable administrative claim. See Cukierman, 265 F.3d at 852 (whether fees recoverable as administrative expense depends upon whether those fees are payable during administrative rent period under terms of lease). Under the bright-line test adopted by the Ninth Circuit in Cukierman, fees incurred after the surrender date cannot be accorded administrative expense priority, even if those fees relate directly to the enforcement of pre-surrender lease obligations. In Cukierman, the BAP had held that the landlord was entitled to fees incurred post-rejection in enforcing its rights to pre-rejection rent, but the court of appeals expressly rejected that approach and reversed the award of fees incurred after surrender. Id. OF 15 Loi \ ~ Date Hon. Thomas E. Carlson MEMORANDUM RE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DUE AS ADMINISTRATIVE RENT =e se: 09-47577 Doc#168 Filed: 10/15/10 Entered: 10/15/10 13:40:31 Page 3 of 3
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.