(PS) Vigil v. Cobb-Hampton et al

2:25-cv-01144Caed5 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THEODORE J. VIGIL,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMYRA COBB-HAMPTON, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 2:25-cv-01144-DC-SCR (PS)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. No. 3)
Plaintiff Theodore J. Vigil is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this matter,
which was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On April 30, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which
were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 3.) On May 7, 2025,
Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 4.)
Plaintiff’s objections do not provide a basis upon which to reject the findings and
recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
analysis.
Case 2:25-cv-01144-DC-SCR Document 5 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on April 30, 2025 (Doc. No. 3) are
ADOPTED in full;
2. This action is dismissed; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2025	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-01144-DC-SCR Document 5 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.