(HC) Fuller v. Warden

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AHMED RASHA FULLER,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent.
No. 2:25-cv-00781-DC-CKD (HC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. Nos. 2, 11, 15)
Petitioner Ahmed Rasha Fuller, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a motion for
emergency stay and release pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2251. (Doc. No. 2.) The matter was referred
to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 10, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion for emergency stay and release pending
habeas review. (Doc. No. 2.) On September 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and
recommendations recommending that Petitioner’s motion be denied. (Doc. No. 11.) The pending
findings and recommendations were served on Petitioner and contained notice that any objections
to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id. at 2.) On
September 11, 2025, Petitioner filed a request for judicial notice of a medical record documenting
his ongoing mental health issues in incarceration.1 (Doc. No. 14.) On September 18, 2025,
1 The court declines to take judicial notice of Plaintiff’s medical record because it is irrelevant to
the resolution of his motion for emergency stay and release pending habeas review.
Case 2:25-cv-00781-DC-CKD Document 21 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations and a second motion for stay and
release pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2251. (Doc. No. 15.) The court reviewed Petitioner’s objections
and second motion for stay and release and finds they do not provide a basis upon which to reject
the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on September 10, 2025 (Doc. No. 11) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Petitioner’s motions for emergency stay and release pending habeas review (Doc.
No. 2 ) is DENIED;
3. Petitioner’s second motion for stay and release (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice of his medical record (Doc. No. 14) is
DENIED; and
5. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further pretrial
proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2025	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-00781-DC-CKD Document 21 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2