(HC)Pedrozo Munoz et al v. Chestnut et al

1:25-cv-01908Caed31 déc. 2025

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHILBER PEDROZO MUNOZ,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al.,
Respondents.
No. 1:25-cv-01908-DC-EFB (HC)
ORDER
Petitioner proceeds with this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2241. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of
constitutional rights is proved, respondent is directed to show cause why the writ should not be
granted by filing an answer/return. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	Respondents’ answer/response to the § 2241 petition is due no later than 20 days
from the date of this order.
2. 	Petitioner’s reply is due 14 days after being served with the answer.
3. 	Respondent shall request and obtain petitioner’s complete A-file and provide a
copy to petitioner’s counsel upon receipt.
DATED: December 31, 2025
Case 1:25-cv-01908-DC-EFB Document 10 Filed 12/31/25 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.