(PC) Hooper v. De La Cruz et al

1:25-cv-00610Caed5 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
ALEXIS HOOPER et al.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANNISA DE LA CRUZ, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK
APPROVED STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Doc. No. 30)
Judge: Hon. Helena Barch-Kuchta
Trial Date: None set
Action Filed: March 3, 2025
The parties stipulate and agree to enter into a protective order to facilitate the exchange of
information for the purposes of preparing for a private mediation that may be set in April 2026.
Good cause appearing, the Court enters the following Protective Order.
I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
The material anticipated to be exchanged under this protective order includes confidential
information or materials related to Plaintiffs’ allegations and claims in this matter including the
following materials Defendants claim are “confidential”: incarcerated persons’ records,
incident reports, investigation reports of the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR), video footage related to the incident, recorded interviews of
Plaintiffs, other incarcerated persons, and CDCR staff members, information related to
disciplinary actions against CDCR staff members, and restricted policies, the disclosure of
which to incarcerated persons or the public would adversely affect the safety of staff and
incarcerated persons within CDCR and the security of CDCR’s institutions. In addition,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
Defendants assert the materials anticipated to be exchanged, if revealed publicly, could
compromise future investigations or prevention of criminal activity as investigative methods,
practices, or procedures would be revealed. In addition, Defendants assert redaction of non-party
names and matters pertaining to non-parties is necessary to protect their privacy and prevent
embarrassment due to the sensitive nature of the investigation, including but not limited to video
footage depicting incarcerated persons and staff. Accordingly, Defendants assert a protective
order is necessary for the following reasons: (1) to protect the privacy of Plaintiffs, non-party
incarcerated persons, and correctional staff; and (2) to protect the safety and security interests of
CDCR and incarcerated persons and in not having the materials disseminated to or misused,
misinterpreted, or manipulated by incarcerated persons or the general public.
This protective order is without prejudice to any objections that may be raised by the parties
or other protective orders the Court or parties deem necessary or request, should this case proceed
to formal discovery.
This Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to
discovery and the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited
information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal
principles. The parties further acknowledge that this Protective Order does not entitle them to file
confidential information under seal and that the local rules set forth the procedures that must be
followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to
file material under seal.
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Action: Hooper v. De La Cruz, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00610 JLT-HBK.
2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
information or items under this Order.
2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is
generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(c) as identified in bold above.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
2.4 Counsel: Counsel of Record for the parties and the support staff for such counsel,
including Staff Counsel.
2.4.1 Staff Counsel: Attorneys employed by CDCR, including their staff and other
CDCR employees reasonably necessary to access, process, review, transmit or otherwise handle
any Protected Material.
2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it
produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”.
2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium
or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or
responses to discovery in this matter.
2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the
litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a
consultant in this Action.
2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items:
extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or
Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm, cause embarrassment to a non-party, or
invade the privacy of a non –party, that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.
2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party to this Action.
2.10 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, and employees
if an entity is named, and consultants.
2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this Action.
2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g.,
photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing,
storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
Producing Party.
3. SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined
above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies,
excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations,
or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the
protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information
that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the
public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a
violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise;
and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the
Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and
under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Protected material includes
documents identified as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” prior to the date of executing
this protective order. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate
agreement or order.
4. DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this
Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims
and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the
completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action,
including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to
applicable law.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or
Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to
limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To
the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only those
parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other
portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not
warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown
to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily
encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens
on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for
protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection initially
asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the
mistaken designation.
5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or
as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection
under this Order must be clearly so designated before or at the time the material is disclosed or
produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding
transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the
legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to
each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page
qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)
(e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the
level of protection being asserted.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which
material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all
of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,
qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the
Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected
Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the
Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate
markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being
asserted.
(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the
Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other
proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When it is
impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it
appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating
Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded)
a right to have up to 21 days after receiving a rough transcript of the deposition, to identify the
specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of
protection being asserted. Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated
for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Proposed
Protective Order.
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other
tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container
or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. Electronic files, such as video or
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
audio recordings, may be designated in such a way as to clearly indicate to the Receiving Party
that they are CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s
right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a
designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is
treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of
confidentiality, including designations as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or redactions of material from documents as provided in this
Order.
6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process
by providing written notice of each designation or redaction it is challenging and describing the
basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written
notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this
specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in
good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other
forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In
conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality
designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the
designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation or redaction
is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to
the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first
or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process
in a timely manner.
6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court
intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality within 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
days of the parties agreeing in writing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their
dispute. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the
movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph.
The parties may agree to extend the time to file a motion. Failure by the Designating Party to
make such a motion including the required declaration within the time specified shall
automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation; however, the
Designating Party can be relieved of any such waiver by the Court for good cause shown. In
addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation within
twenty-one days of the parties agreeing in writing that the meet and confer process will not
resolve their dispute, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any
portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a
competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer
requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to
sanctions. All parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to
which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the challenge.
7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or
produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has
been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
DISPOSITION).
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in
a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by
the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any
information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” in this case only to:
(a) Plaintiffs in this case, except that Plaintiffs shall only be shown material designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” that pertains directly to them, and shall not be shown or provided
information or material pertaining to other incarcerated plaintiffs without the express consent of
the Producing Party’s Counsel of Record;
(b) the Receiving Party’s Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of said
Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this
litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is
attached hereto as Exhibit A;
(c) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(d) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(e) the court and its personnel and a private mediator jointly retained by the Parties;
(f) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(g) during their depositions, witnesses in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably
necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),
unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed
deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately
bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this
Stipulated Protective Order.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
(h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other
person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the
Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of said
Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this
litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is
attached hereto as Exhibit A;
(b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this
litigation, and (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit
A);
(c) the court and its personnel and a private mediator jointly retained by the Parties;
(d) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and
(e) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other
person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
OTHER LITIGATION
8.1 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that
compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL”
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”, then the Party shall:
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy
of the subpoena or court order;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the
other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this
Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
8.2 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the
subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this Action as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a
determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained
the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of
seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions
should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a
lawful directive from another court.
9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED
IN THIS LITIGATION
9.1 The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this
Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY”. Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this Action is
protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should
be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
9.2 In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-
Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with
the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:
(a). promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of
the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
(b) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Protective Order in this litigation,
the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information
requested; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
(c) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.
9.3 If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within
14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce
the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party
timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its
possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a
determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the
burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.
10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Protective Order, the
Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized
disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c)
inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this
Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to
Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The notification to the Designating Party must
include a detailed description of how the inadvertent disclosure occurred. Designating Party has
the right to seek sanctions, if appropriate, at any time against the Receiving Party for inadvertent
disclosure, which may include a request for an order to return all Protected Material and prohibit
any further use by the Receiving Party. Moreover, nothing in this Order shall either confer
liability, or relieve the Receiving Party from any liability, for any injuries, legal proceedings or
damages arising from the inadvertent disclosure of Protected Material.
11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently
produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This
provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a
communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product
protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order
submitted to the court.
12. MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek
its modification by the court in the future.
12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. This Order is without prejudice to the parties' rights
to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground should this case
proceed to formal discovery. Similarly, this Order is without prejudice to the right of any party to
object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or a
court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the
public record in this Action or any other action or proceeding any Protected Material. A Party that
seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with the local rules. Protected
Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
specific Protected Material at issue. A sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing
that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise
entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under
seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected Material in the public
record unless otherwise instructed by the court.
12.4 Nothing in this Order shall be construed as limiting in any way the California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) from utilizing any material designated or
produced under this Order in its normal or usual course of operations.
13. FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, each
Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,
compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected
Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all
pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda,
correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and
consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such
archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective
Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 31, 2025 Respectfully Submitted,
LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN
(as authorized on December 31, 2025)
/s/ Mark E. Merin
By: __________________________________
Mark E. Merin
Paul H. Masuhara
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Alexis Hooper and the class of similarly
situated persons she seeks to represent
Dated: December 31, 2025
/s/ Arthur B. Mark III
By: __________________________________
Alicia A. Bower
Jacqueline Kallberg
Arthur B. Mark III
Attorneys for Defendants
A. De La Cruz, I. Arroyo,
M. Felix, V. Ramolete,
and E. Becerra
Dated: December 31, 2025 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Lynne G. Stocker
(as authorized on December 17, 2025)
By: __________________________________
Lynne G. Stocker
Attorneys for Defendant
C. Mendoza
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 2, 2026
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16
. Stip. Prot. Order and Proposed Order (1:25-cv-00610-JLT-HBK)
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
I, __________________ [print or type full name], of_______________________________
[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and
understand the Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California on ________________ (date) in the case of Hooper v. De La Cruz, et al.
Case No. 1:25-cv-00610) I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this
Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to
sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in
any manner any information or item that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity
except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Protective Order, even
if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this Action.
I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of
___________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my
California agent for service of process in connection with this Action or any proceedings related
to enforcement of this Protective Order.
Date: _________________________________
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
Printed name: ______________________________[printed name]
Signature: __________________________________[signature]
SA2025303530
39473670

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.