1:25-cv-00507•(PC) Snell v. Tuolumne County, et al.
Texte intégral
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL SNELL, Plaintiff, v. TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB (PC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 24) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 21, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2026 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL SNELL, Plaintiff, V. TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB (PC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 24) Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 21, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2026 Say A. Be STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.