(HC) Jansen v. Ourique

1:25-cv-00491Caed14 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL EDWARD JANSEN,
Petitioner,
v.
JERRY OURIQUE,
Respondent.
No. 1:25-cv-00491 JLT SAB (HC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
GROUNDS TWO AND THREE OF THE
PETITION, GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION TO STAY, STAYING
PROCEEDINGS, AND DIRECTING
PETITIONER TO FILE STATUS REPORT
(Doc. 9)
Michael Edward Jansen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of
habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
The magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Grounds
Two and Three of the petition be dismissed and Petitioner’s motion to stay be granted. (Doc. 9.)
The Court served the findings and recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any
objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days after service. (Id.) The Court also advised
him that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. (Id. at
8.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.
According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the
case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and
Case 1:25-cv-00491-JLT-SAB Document 10 Filed 11/14/25 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. The findings and recommendations issued on August 21, 2025 (Doc. 9) are
ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. Grounds Two and Three of the petition are DISMISSED.
3. Petitioner’s motion to stay is GRANTED.
4. The proceedings are STAYED pending exhaustion of state remedies.
5. Petitioner SHALL file a status report within 30 days of the date of service of this
order, and every 90 days thereafter.
6. Within 30 days following the final order of the state courts, Petitioner SHALL notify
the Court and request that the stay be lifted and the case proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2025
Case 1:25-cv-00491-JLT-SAB Document 10 Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.