Loreto v. Arizona Board of Regents et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Angelica M Loreto,
Plaintiff,
v.
Arizona Board of Regents, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-22-00269-TUC-JAS (MSA)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States
Magistrate Judge Aguilera that recommends denying Defendant Arizona Board of
Regents’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 62; see also Doc. 57.) A review of the
record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and
Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. Therefore, the Court will not
consider any objections or new evidence.
The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s
recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;
Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.
Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
(1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is accepted
and adopted.
(2) Defendant Arizona Board of Regents’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57)
Case 4:22-cv-00269-JAS-MSA Document 63 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
is denied. The Parties are directed to Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and
Recommendation for a more detailed explanation.
(3) Consistent with Doc. 49, the parties shall file a Joint Proposed Pre-Trial Order
within 30 days of this Order.
Dated this 18th day of November, 2025.
Case 4:22-cv-00269-JAS-MSA Document 63 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 2