2:26-cv-02586•Baptiste v. Bondi et al
Texte intégral
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Petitioner Dieunette Jean Baptiste has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). The Honorable Camille D. Bibles, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 11), recommending that the Court grant the Petition. Judge Bibles advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 11 at 21) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. Dieunette Jean Baptiste, Petitioner, vs. Pamela Bondi, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-26-02586-PHX-SPL ORDER Case 2:26-cv-02586-SPL Document 14 Filed 06/10/26 Page 1 of 2
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court will adopt the R&R and grant the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is accepted and adopted by the Court. 2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) is granted. Respondents must either immediately release Petitioner or, within seven (7) days, provide Petitioner with a bond hearing before a neutral arbiter at which hearing the government shall bear the burden of producing clear and convincing evidence that Petitioner would pose a flight risk or be a danger to the community if released from detention on bond or on recognizance. If a bond hearing is held, the adjudicator must prepare a written, explained decision, rather than checking boxes on a form, describing the clear and convincing evidence proffered by the government that the adjudicator considered when reaching their decision. 3. That the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Petitioner and terminate this action. Dated this 10th day of June, 2026. Honorable Steven P. Logan United States District Judge Case 2:26-cv-02586-SPL Document 14 Filed 06/10/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.