Hunter v. TForce Freight Incorporated

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles Hunter,
Plaintiff,
v.
TForce Freight Incorporated,
Defendant.
No. CV-26-00122-PHX-KML
ORDER
Plaintiff Charles Hunter seeks an extension of time to complete service of the
summons and complaint. (Doc. 25.) Hunter’s motion states he “prepared and submitted the
Summons for issuance” and “is awaiting issuance of the Summons by the Clerk of Court.”
(Doc. 25.) The docket does not reflect Hunter submitted a summons for issuance. Hunter
is reminded again that if he is using generative artificial intelligence to prepare his filings,
he must comply with the court’s procedures regarding generative AI. Those procedures
require Hunter identify the portions of any filing incorporating generative AI outputs. (Doc.
24 at 3.) Hunter also must certify that he has “personally reviewed and verified the content
of the filing as accurate.” (Doc. 24 at 3.) Hunter appears to have violated these
requirements. And even if he did not use generative AI to draft his latest motion, the
representation that he submitted a summons to the clerk’s office and is awaiting its issuance
appears to lack evidentiary support. Such false statements may lead to sanctions, including
dismissal of this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3). Any future motion containing a false
statement of law and fact will be summarily denied.
Case 2:26-cv-00122-KML Document 26 Filed 04/27/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Extension (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff
shall file proof of service no later than May 27, 2026. The Clerk of Court shall enter a
judgment of dismissal with prejudice in the event no proof of service is filed by that date.
Dated this 27th day of April, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-00122-KML Document 26 Filed 04/27/26 Page 2 of 2