Laurean-Ayala v. Noem et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Julio Armando Laurean-Ayala,
Petitioner,
v.
Kristi Noem, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CV-25-04425-PHX-KML (JFM)
ORDER
In their response to the order to show cause, respondents argue there is no live case
or controversy because “Petitioner has already been granted a bond hearing with
individualized findings.” (Doc. 8.) A declaration from a Deportation Officer explains that
on December 3, 2025, “the immigration court . . . denied the Petitioner bond because the
court lacked jurisdiction. Additionally, the immigration court found that if the court had
jurisdiction, bond would be denied because the Petitioner is a danger.” (Doc. 8-1 at 2.)
Relying on that second basis for denying bond, respondents argue it is immaterial whether
the immigration court’s first basis was incorrect. Petitioner filed a reply that does not
address the alternative finding of dangerousness. (Doc. 10.) Based in large part on
petitioner’s failure to address this issue, the court concludes it lacks jurisdiction because it
could not order any relief.
/
/
/
Case 2:25-cv-04425-KML--JFM Document 11 Filed 12/12/25 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice and close this
case.
Dated this 12th day of December, 2025.
Case 2:25-cv-04425-KML--JFM Document 11 Filed 12/12/25 Page 2 of 2