Hodge v. Doordash Incorporated

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Najib A. Hodge,
Plaintiff,
v.
NAPA Genuine Auto Parts, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-25-02242-PHX-JAT
ORDER
On January 27, 2026, Plaintiff Najib A. Hodge filed a Motion to Exceed Page Limit
for Response Brief (Doc. 31) and filed his Response Brief (Doc. 32). Plaintiff’s proposed
response is two pages over the seventeen page limit established by LRCiv 7.2(e)(1).
Because Plaintiff’s requested extension is modest, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion
to exceed the page limit for his response brief and will deem Plaintiff’s Response Brief
(Doc. 32) properly filed. See Remato v. City of Phoenix, No. CV 09-2027-PHX-FJM, 2011
WL 3648268 (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2011).
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Exceed Page Limit for Response (Doc.
31) is granted, and Plaintiff’s Response Brief (Doc. 32) is deemed to be properly filed.
Dated this 27th day of January, 2026.
Case 2:25-cv-02242-JAT Document 33 Filed 01/28/26 Page 1 of 1