6:25-cv-06099•Russell v. McMurry
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION ERIC DEMOND RUSSELL PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 6:25-CV-6099 WAYNE MCMURRY DEFENDANT ORDER Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. On March 13, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the Court’s order of dismissal and directed the Clerk to mail him a copy of the Report and Recommendation at his new address. He was granted twenty-one additional days to file objections. The deadline has now passed, and no objections were filed. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 7th day of April, 2026. /s/ Timothy L. Brooks TIMOTHY L. BROOKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 6:25-cv-06099-TLB Document 22 Filed 04/07/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.