6:23-cv-06029•Joyce v. Finkbeiner et al
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION MICHAEL TYRONE JOSEPH JOYCE PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 6:23-cv-06029 SHERIFF SCOTT FINKBEINER, Hot Spring County, Arkansas; JAIL ADMINISTRATOR FRED PHILLIPS; OFFICER BERLAN, Badge #141; and OFFICER PILCHER DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed October 10, 2024, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 27). Plaintiff Michael Tyrone Joseph Joyce (“Plaintiff”) has objected. (ECF No. 28). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. In the R&R, Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants Sheriff Scott Finkbeiner, Jail Administrator Fred Phillips, Officer Berlan, and Officer Pilcher’s (together, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) be granted and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 27, at 17). Plaintiff has timely objected. (ECF No. 28). However, Plaintiff’s objection fails to articulate a clear argument critical of Judge Bryant’s R&R and instead reiterates many of the factual allegations underlying his claim. The Court will not address these issues. However, the Court will address Plaintiff’s non-specific objection that Judge Bryant failed to locate specific records from Plaintiff’s therapist. (ECF No. 28, at 4). Upon review of the record, the Court has Case 6:23-cv-06029-SOH Document 31 Filed 03/31/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 located these documents (ECF No. 23, at 74) and finds that they do not change Judge Bryant’s analysis or findings. Upon de novo review, the Court hereby adopts the R&R (ECF No. 27) in toto. Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 31st day of March, 2025. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge Case 6:23-cv-06029-SOH Document 31 Filed 03/31/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.