5:22-cr-50061•USA v. Horton et al
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION RICHARD PATRICK HORTON PETITIONER V. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-50061 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENT ORDER Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 141) filed in this case on January 27, 2026, by the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No objections were filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 129), is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. His Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 138) and Motion for Copies (Doc. 140) are DENIED as MOOT. Further, any future request for a certificate of appealability will be denied for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 18th day of February, 2026. /s/ Timothy L. Brooks TIMOTHY L. BROOKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:22-cr-50061-TLB Document 142 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.