Muldrew v. Courtney

4:24-cv-04085Arwd14 févr. 2025

Texte intégral

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
QUARTAVIS DEMONTEZ MULDREW 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:24-cv-4085
DETECTIVE JIMMY COURTNEY 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Barry A.
Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 17. Upon
preservice screening of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14) pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A, Judge Bryant recommends that the Second Amended Complaint be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Judge Bryant further recommends that the Clerk be
directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration.
Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Bryant’s
reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 17) in toto. Plaintiff’s Second Amended
Complaint (ECF No. 14) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is hereby
directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of February, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:24-cv-04085-SOH Document 18 Filed 02/14/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.