2:24-cv-02157•Bruce v. Metcalf et al
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION JAY OLDEN BRUCE, JR. PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 2:24-CV-2157 OFFICER TOMMY METCALF (Crawford County Justice Center) and SHERIFF JIMMY DAMANTE (Crawford County, Arkansas) DEFENDANTS ORDER Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. Finally, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court finds that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 24th day of February, 2025. /s/ Timothy L. Brooks TIMOTHY L. BROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:24-cv-02157-TLB Document 7 Filed 02/24/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.