1:24-cv-01052•Hardy v. Mitcham et al
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION RAYMOND DOUGLAS HARDY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 1:24-cv-1052 CAPTAIN RICHARD MITCHAM and CAPTAIN LISA WORLEY DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 9. Judge Bryant recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on this case for future judicial consideration. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 12th day of February, 2025. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge Case 1:24-cv-01052-SOH-BAB Document 12 Filed 02/12/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.