4:25-cv-00930•Robertson v. Sander et al
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL ROBERTSON PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:25-CV-00930-BSM SARAH SANDER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] is adopted, Michael Robertson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 5] is denied, and his amended complaint [Doc. No. 6] is dismissed without prejudice because he has had at least three previous actions dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and has not shown that he is currently in imminent danger of serious physical injury or paid the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (prisoners may not proceed in forma pauperis if three or more of their claims have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failure to state a claim, unless they show they are in imminent danger of serious physical injury). If Robertson wishes to continue this case, he must submit the statutory and administrative fees of $405 to the Clerk of Court with a motion to reopen the case. An in forma pauperis appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2025. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-00930-BSM Document 13 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.