Gerald Ray Hoffman v. State of Florida

CourtListener 10877604Fladistctapp19 juin 2026

Texte intégral

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________

Case No. 5D2025-2803
LT Case No. 42-2006-CF-1659-A
_____________________________

GERALD RAY HOFFMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.
_____________________________

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.
Timothy Thomas McCourt, Judge.

Gerald Ray Hoffman, Raiford, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel
Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

June 19, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, No.
SC2023-1184, 2026 WL 1346031, at *4 (Fla. May 14, 2026) (noting
that Erlinger[1] does not apply retroactively to cases that have

1 Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024).
become final and that arguments related to Apprendi[2] are not
cognizable under rule 3.800(a)); see also Galindez v. State, 955 So.
2d 517, 522 (Fla. 2007) (holding that the harmless error analysis
to be applied to an Apprendi violation is whether the record
demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury
would have found the fact absent the error).

JAY, C.J., and MAKAR and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________

2 Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.