In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar - Discipline Rules

Supreme Court of Florida
____________

No. SC2025-0019
____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA
BAR – DISCIPLINE RULES.

August 28, 2025

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar petitions the Court to amend the Rules

Regulating The Florida Bar and the Code for Resolving

Professionalism Referrals.1 We adopt the Bar’s proposed

amendments with a minor modification.

BACKGROUND

The Bar proposes amending rules 3-5.2 (Emergency

Suspension and Interim Probation), 3-5.4 (Publication of

Discipline), 3-7.7 (Procedures Before Supreme Court of Florida),

3-7.18 (Disposition of Inquiries or Complaints Referred to the Bar

by Members of the Judiciary), 14-4.1 (Arbitration Proceedings), and

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.; see also
R. Regulating Fla. Bar 1-12.1.
20-5.1 (Generally). Additionally, the Bar proposes amending Code

for Resolving Professionalism Referrals 1.2 (Referrals to The Florida

Bar).

The proposed amendments were approved by the Board of

Governors of The Florida Bar and, consistent with rule 1-12.1(g),

the Bar published formal notice of its intent to file the petition in

The Florida Bar News. The notice directed interested parties to file

comments directly with the Court. No comments were received.

We hereby adopt the Bar’s proposed amendments to the Rules

Regulating The Florida Bar and the Code for Resolving

Professionalism Referrals with a minor modification. We explain

the modification below, along with some of the more significant rule

changes.

AMENDMENTS

Rule 3-5.2(b) (Petition for Interim Probation) is amended to

include four new subdivisions. The new subdivisions establish a

process by which a lawyer may move to dissolve or amend an order

imposing interim probation. Except for the standard to dissolve or

amend an interim probation, the process established by the new

subdivisions is the same as the process in subdivision (a)

-2-
(Emergency Suspension) by which a lawyer may seek to dissolve or

amend an emergency suspension.

Next, rule 3-7.7(c)(3) (Procedure for Review; Briefs) is amended

to align the time periods for filing answer, reply, and cross-reply

briefs with the time periods for filing such briefs in Florida Rule of

Appellate Procedure 9.210(g) (Time for Service of Briefs).

Specifically, the time periods in subdivision (c)(3) to file an answer,

reply, or cross-reply briefs are extended from 20 days to 30 days

after service of the opposing party’s brief.

Rule 3-7.18(a)(2) is amended to limit the applicability of the

judicial referral process. Under the amended rule, a judicial referral

may not address “allegations of violations of canons, rules, or law

relating to judicial elections.” Such allegations must instead be

provided to the Bar using the normal complaint process. Also,

under the amended rule, a judge may only submit a judicial referral

with respect to those matters the judge becomes aware of in the

course of his or her official duties as a judicial officer. To make this

requirement clear, we revise the Bar’s proposal to read, “The

member of the judiciary submitting the referral must have obtained

-3-
the information about the bar member’s conduct during the course

of the member of the judiciary’s official duties as a judicial officer.”

Rule 20-5.1(a) is amended to make persons “currently on the

inactive list due to incapacity” ineligible to become a registered

paralegal. And Code for Resolving Professionalism Referrals 1.2 is

amended to require the Bar to refer back to a Local Professionalism

Panel for handling through its informal processes any conduct the

panel referred to it that “does not result in bar disciplinary

proceedings or diversion to a practice and professionalism program

in lieu of discipline.”

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the

Code for Resolving Professionalism Referrals are amended as set

forth in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by

struck-through type, and new language is indicated by

underscoring. The amendments become effective October 27, 2025,

at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS,
FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

-4-
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules Regulating The Florida Bar

Rosalyn Sia Baker-Barnes, President, Michael Fox Orr, President-
elect, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, Elizabeth Clark Tarbert,
Division Director, Lawyer Regulation, and Kelly N. Smith, Senior
Attorney, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-5-
APPENDIX

RULE 3-5.2. EMERGENCY SUSPENSION AND INTERIM
PROBATION

(a) Emergency Suspension.

(1) – (5) [No Change]

(6) Motions for Dissolutionto Dissolve or Amend. The
lawyer may move at any time to dissolve or amend an emergency
order by motion filed with the Supreme Court of Florida, unless the
bar has demonstrated, through a hearing or trial, the likelihood of
prevailing on the merits on any of the underlying violations of the
Rules Regulating The Florida Bar that establishes the respondent is
causing great public harm. The lawyer must serve a copy of the
motion on bar counsel. The motion will not stay any other
proceedings or applicable time limitations in the case and will
immediately be assigned to a referee designated by the chief justice,
unless the motion fails to state good cause or is procedurally barred
as an invalid successive motion. The filing of the motion will not
stay the operation of an emergency suspension order entered under
this subdivision.

(7) Successive Motions Prohibited. The Supreme Court
of Florida will summarily dismiss any successive motions for
dissolution or amendment that raises issues that were, or with due
diligence could have been, raised in a prior motion.

(8) Hearing on Petition to Terminate or ModifyMotion to
Dissolve or Amend Suspension. The referee will hear a motion to
terminate or modifydissolve or amend a suspension imposed under
this subdivision within 7 days of assignment and submit a report
and recommendation to the Supreme Court of Florida in an
electronic format approved by the supreme court within 7 days of
the hearing date. The referee will recommend dissolution or
amendment, whichever is appropriate, if the bar cannot
demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits on at least 1 of

-6-
the underlying violations of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar
that establishes the respondent is causing great public harm.

(9) – (10) [No Change]

(b) Petition for Interim Probation.

(1) – (3) [No Change]

(4) Motions to Dissolve or Amend. The lawyer may move
at any time to dissolve or amend an order imposing interim
probation by motion filed with the Supreme Court of Florida, unless
the bar has demonstrated, through a hearing or trial, the likelihood
of prevailing on the merits on any of the underlying violations of the
Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The lawyer must serve a copy of
the motion on bar counsel. The motion will not stay any other
proceedings or applicable time limitations in the case and will
immediately be assigned to a referee designated by the chief justice,
unless the motion fails to state good cause or is procedurally barred
as an invalid successive motion. The filing of the motion will not
stay the operation of an interim probation order entered under this
subdivision.

(5) Successive Motions Prohibited. The Supreme Court
of Florida will summarily dismiss any successive motion for
dissolution or amendment that raises issues that were, or with due
diligence could have been, raised in a prior motion.

(6) Hearing on Motion to Dissolve or Amend Interim
Probation. The referee will hear a motion to dissolve or amend an
interim probation imposed under this subdivision within 7 days of
assignment and submit a report and recommendation to the
Supreme Court of Florida in an electronic format approved by the
supreme court within 7 days of the hearing date. The referee will
recommend dissolution or amendment, whichever is appropriate, if
the bar cannot demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on the merits
on at least 1 of the underlying violations of the Rules Regulating
The Florida Bar that establishes that conditions or restrictions on a

-7-
lawyer’s privilege to practice law in Florida are necessary to protect
the public.

(7) Review by the Supreme Court of Florida. The
Supreme Court of Florida will review and act on the referee’s
findings and recommendations on receipt of the referee’s report on
the motion for dissolution or amendment. Briefing schedules
following the petition for review are as set forth in subchapter 3-7 of
these rules.

(48) Hearings on Issues Raised in Petitions for Interim
Probation. Once the Supreme Court of Florida has granted a
petition for interim probation under this rule, the referee appointed
by the court will hear the matter in the same manner as provided in
rule 3-7.6, except that the referee will hear the matter after the
lawyer charged has answered the charges in the petition for interim
probation or when the time has expired for filing an answer. The
referee will issue a final report and recommendation in an electronic
format approved by the supreme court within 90 days of
appointment. If the time limit specified in this subdivision is not
met, that portion of an emergency order imposing an interim
probation will be automatically dissolved, except on order of the
Supreme Court of Florida, provided that any other appropriate
disciplinary action on the underlying conduct still may be taken.

(5) Review by the Supreme Court of Florida. The
Supreme Court of Florida will review and act on the referee’s
findings and recommendations regarding interim probations on
receipt of the referee’s report. Briefing schedules following the
petition for review are as set forth in subchapter 3-7 of these rules.

(c) – (e) [No Change]

RULE 3-5.4. PUBLICATION OF DISCIPLINE

(a) – (d) [No Change]

Comment

-8-
All disciplinary sanctions as defined in rules 3-5.1 and 3-5.2,
or their predecessors, entered in cases opened on or after March 17,
1990 are public information. Therefore, an inquiry into the conduct
of a member of the bar will result in a disclosure of all these
sanctions.

The public policy of this state is to provide reasonable means
of access to public information. In furtherance of this policy, this
rule is enacted so that all persons may understand what public
information concerning lawyer disciplinary sanctions is available
and in what format. This rule does not alter current court
procedure or other requirements.

Admonishments are issued for minor misconduct and are the
lowest form of disciplinary sanction. An admonishment is often
issued for technical rule violations or for rule violations that did not
result in harm. The court’s orders imposing admonishments
contain the heading “Not to be Published” and this rule directs that
those admonishments not be published in the Southern Reporter
and directs The Florida Bar not to publish those admonishments in
its newspaper, The Florida Bar News. The court does so in order to
maintain a tangible difference between the sanctions of
admonishment and public reprimand.

This rule does not bar disclosure of admonishments in
response to an inquiry, whether written, oral, or electronic, and
does not bar publication of admonishments on any website of The
Florida Bar.

RULE 3-7.7. PROCEDURES BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF
FLORIDA

All referee reports and all judgments entered in proceedings
under these rules are subject to review by the Supreme Court of
Florida in the following manner.

(a) – (b) [No Change]

-9-
(c) Procedure for Review. The Supreme Court of Florida
will conduct its review using the following procedures.

(1) – (2) [No Change]

(3) Briefs. The party first seeking review must file a
brief in support of the notice of intent to seek review within 30 days
of the filing of the notice. The opposing party must file an answer
brief within 2030 days after the service of the initial brief of the
party seeking review, which must also support any cross-notice for
review. The party originally seeking review may file a reply brief
within 2030 days after the service of the answer brief. The cross-
reply brief, if any, must be served within 2030 days of the reply
brief’s filing. Computation of time for filing briefs under this rule
follows the applicable Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The
form, length, binding, type, and margin requirements of briefs filed
under this rule follow the requirements of Fla. R. App. P. 9.210.

(4) – (7) [No Change]

(d) – (h) [No Change]

Comment

[No Change]

RULE 3-7.18. DISPOSITION OF INQUIRIES OR COMPLAINTS
REFERRED TO THE BAR BY MEMBERS OF THE
JUDICIARY

(a) Definitions. Wherever used in this rule, the following
words or terms have the following meaning:

(1) [No Change]

(2) Judicial Referral. A judicial referral is an inquiry,
communication, or complaint questioning the conduct of a member

- 10 -
of the bar submitted to the bar by a member of the judiciary. The
member of the judiciary submitting the referral must have obtained
the information about the bar member’s conduct during the course
of the member of the judiciary’s official duties as a judicial officer.
A judicial referral also includes a court order, judgment, or opinion
specifically referring to the bar a matter questioning the conduct of
a member of the bar. A judicial referral does not include allegations
of violations of canons, rules, or law relating to judicial elections.

(b) – (d) [No Change]

RULE 14-4.1. ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

(a) Institution of Proceedings. All arbitration proceedings
are instituted by filing a written consent to arbitration by written
contract between the parties to the arbitration, orders of this
courtthe Supreme Court of Florida in proceedings under these
Rules Regulating The Florida Bar imposing a sanction or condition
of probation, or consent form prescribed in the policies adopted
under the authority of this chapter and signed by each party to the
controversy.

(b) [No Change]

(c) Referral by Intake Counsel or Bar Counsel. A case
may be referred to the fee arbitration program with the consent of:

(1) Intakeintake counsel, with the consent of and the
parties and concurrence of staff counsel; or

(2) bar counsel, with the consent of the parties, and the
concurrence of the chief branch staffdiscipline counsel, may refer
appropriate cases to the fee arbitration program.

(d) – (e) [No Change]

RULE 20-5.1. GENERALLY

- 11 -
A person is ineligible for registration or renewal of a
registration to become a Florida Registered Paralegal if that person:

(a) is currently on the inactive list due to incapacity, is
currently suspended or disbarred, or has resigned or been revoked
in lieu of discipline from the practice of law in any state or
jurisdiction;

(b) – (h) [No Change]

THE CODE FOR RESOLVING PROFESSIONALISM REFERRALS

1.2 Referrals to The Florida Bar. Minor or isolated
instances of unprofessional conduct may be addressed through the
informal process described in this code. However, when
unprofessional conduct is substantial or repeated, that conduct
may be referred to The Florida Bar for a disciplinary investigation
into whether the formal disciplinary process should be initiated. In
particular, Rule 4-8.4(d) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar
has been the basis for imposing discipline in these instances. See
e.g., The Florida Bar v. Norkin, 132 So. 3d 77 (Fla. 2013) (holding
that lawyer’s unprofessional behavior at numerous hearings
violated Rule Reg. Fla. Bar 4-3.5(c) and inappropriate emails and
outbursts violated Rule Reg. Fla. Bar 4-8.4(d); The Florida Bar v.
Ratiner, 46 So. 3d 35 (Fla. 2010) (holding that lawyer’s
unprofessional deposition conduct violated Rules Reg. Fla. Bar 3-
4.3, 3-4.4, 4-3.5, 4-4.4(a), 4-8.4(b), and 4-8.4(d)); The Florida Bar v.
Abramson, 3 So. 3d 964 (Fla. 2009) (holding that lawyer’s
disrespectful and confrontational conduct toward a judge and jury
violated Rules Reg. Fla. Bar 4-3.5(a), 4-3.5(c), 4-8.2(a), 4-8.4(d));
and The Florida Bar v. Martocci, 791 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 2001)
(holding that lawyer’s disparaging and profane remarks to opposing
party and counsel violated Rule Reg. Fla. Bar 4-8.4(d)). The bar
must refer back to the appropriate circuit LPP for handling through
its informal process any conduct that an LPP referred to the bar
that does not result in bar disciplinary proceedings or diversion to a
practice and professionalism program in lieu of discipline, but for

- 12 -
which the bar determines prosecution through the disciplinary
process is not warranted, to the LPP for the appropriate circuit for
handling through the informal process described in this code.

- 13 -