Jesse Stone v. State of Florida

2025-2911Fladistctapp4

Texte intégral

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JESSE STONE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2911
[December 10, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF001442.
Jesse Stone, Bushnell, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM .
Affirmed. 	See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding
that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a
change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when
it was decided).
KUNTZ , C.J., FORST and SHAW , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

JESSE STONE,
Appellant,

Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2911
[December 10, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF001442.

Jesse Stone, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding
that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a
change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when
it was decided).

KUNTZ, C.J., FORST and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.