2023-2172•Jones v. State of Florida
Texte intégral
FIRST DISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-2172 _____________________________ LANDO J ONES, Appellant, v. STATE OF F LORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the County Court for Bay County. Shane Vann, Judge. February 18, 2026 PER C URIAM. Lando Jones appeals from his judgment and sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia. He raises three issues, but we write to address only one. Jones argues that the trial court erred by conducting a bench trial even though Jones never waived his right to a jury trial. The State concedes that this was reversible error, and we agree. Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to a jury trial, under both the United States and Florida constitutions. Amend. VI, U.S. Const.; Art. I, § 22, Fla. Const. A defendant may waive his right to a jury trial, “provided that the waiver is reflected on
2 the record.” Tucker v. State, 559 So. 2d 218, 219–20 (Fla. 1990). Here, there is no record evidence that Jones ever waived his right to a jury trial. Thus, we REVERSE Jones’ judgment and sentence. K ELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and L ONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D2023-2172 LANDO JONES, Appellant, Vv. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court for Bay County. Shane Vann, Judge. February 18, 2026 PER CURIAM. Lando Jones appeals from his judgment and sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia. He raises three issues, but we write to address only one. Jones argues that the trial court erred by conducting a bench trial even though Jones never waived his right to a jury trial. The State concedes that this was reversible error, and we agree. Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to a jury trial, under both the United States and Florida constitutions. Amend. VI, U.S. Const.; Art. I, § 22, Fla. Const. A defendant may waive his right to a jury trial, “provided that the waiver is reflected on the record.” Tucker v. State, 559 So. 2d 218, 219-20 (Fla. 1990). Here, there is no record evidence that Jones ever waived his right to a jury trial. Thus, we REVERSE Jones’ judgment and sentence. KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331, Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.