Stewart v. State of Florida

2024-2366Fladistctapp1

Texte intégral

FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2024-2366
_____________________________
M ARCUS W AYNE STEWART ,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA ,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.
April 15, 2026
P ER C URIAM.
A FFIRMED. See Coleman v. State, 315 So. 3d 166, 168 (Fla. 1st
DCA 	2021) 	(concluding 	that 	argument 	to 	trial 	court 	that
statements were unreliable, without “assert[ing] that the trial
court’s 	findings 	were 	legally 	insufficient,” 	fails 	to 	preserve 	a
sufficiency challenge under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes);
Bass v. State, 35 So. 3d 43, 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citing Reynolds
v. State, 660 So. 2d 778, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)) (finding section
90.403 	challenge 	unpreserved 	where 	objection 	in 	trial 	court
addressed 	bolstering, 	prior 	consistent 	statements, 	and
cumulativeness but did not raise the balancing test under section
90.403).
R OBERTS, W INOKUR , and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, 	Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Kevin P.
Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
James 	Uthmeier, 	Attorney 	General, 	Tallahassee, 	and 	Darcy
Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-2366

MARCUS WAYNE STEWART,
Appellant,
v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.
Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

April 15, 2026
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Coleman v. State, 315 So. 3d 166, 168 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2021) (concluding that argument to trial court that
statements were unreliable, without “assert[ing] that the trial
court’s findings were legally insufficient,” fails to preserve a
sufficiency challenge under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes);
Bass v. State, 35 So. 3d 48, 46 (Fla. Ist DCA 2010) (citing Reynolds
v. State, 660 So. 2d 778, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)) (finding section
90.403 challenge unpreserved where objection in trial court
addressed bolstering, prior consistent statements, and

cumulativeness but did not raise the balancing test under section
90.403).

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Kevin P.
Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Darcy
Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.