Lamar Jay Fullmer v. State of Florida

FIFTH DISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-2009
LT Case No. 05-1999-CF-037438-A
_____________________________
LAMAR J AY F ULLMER,
Appellant,
v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County.
Michelle L. Naberhaus, Judge.
Lamar Jay Fullmer, Okeechobee, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
March 6, 2026
S OUD, J.
Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his
abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking
his judgment and sentence in Brevard County Circuit Court Case
No. 1999-CF-37438, this Court issued an order directing Appellant
to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se
filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having
carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause
why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant

2
is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further
pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited
from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning
Brevard County Circuit Court Case No. 1999-CF-37438. The Clerk
of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings
concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject
any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a
member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652
So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The
Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion
to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary
proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2025); Simpkins v. State,
909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
APPELLANT PROHIBITED.
L AMBERT and E ISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.