EEOC Appeal 2020001200

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Allan F., 1
Complainant,
v.
Louis DeJoy,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Eastern Area),
Agency.
Request No. 2020001200
Appeal No. 0120182604
Hearing No. 430-2016-00363X
Agency No. 4C250006215
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or
Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120182604 (October 9, 2019).
EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to
reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where
the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous
interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact
on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c).
Complainant was employed as a Postmaster, EAS-22, at the Post Office in Bristol, Tennessee.
Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging he was discriminated against on the bases of race
(Caucasian), sex (male), and age when: (1) on September 22, 2015, he was reassigned to the Post
Office in Abington, Virginia; and (2) on October 20, 2015, he was placed on administrative
leave.
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name
when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.

2020001200	2
Our 	prior 	appellate 	decision 	affirmed 	the 	Equal 	Employment 	Opportunity 	Commission
Administrative Judge’s (AJ) decision by summary judgment which found in favor of the Agency,
concluding 	Complainant 	failed 	to 	prove 	his 	discrimination 	claims. 	The 	AJ 	found 	that
Complainant failed to present facts that would show the Agency’s actions were a pretext for
discrimination.
In his request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses his disagreement with the previous
decision and presents some arguments that he made previously. We emphasize that a request for
reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. 	See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, § VII.A.
Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision
involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial
impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. 	Complainant has not done so
here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the
request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the
Commission to deny the request. 	The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120182604 remains the
Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the
Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal
from the Commission’s decision. 	You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate
United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive
this decision. 	If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the
person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her
full name and official title. 	Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or
department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The
court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.

2020001200	3
Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled
Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ 	Carlton M. Hadden’s signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 24, 2020
Date