United States v. 2011-10-31 | 06-35333 | GREENE V. CAMRETA | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 SARAH GREENE, personally and as
next friend for S.G., a minor, and
K.G., a minor, No. 06-35333
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
v. CV-05-06047-AA
 District of Oregon,BOB CAMRETA; DESCHUTES COUNTY; EugeneJAMES ALFORD, Deschutes County
Sheriff; BEND LAPINE SCHOOL ORDER
DISTRICT; TERRY FRIESEN,
Defendants-Appellees. 
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed October 31, 2011
Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges,
and Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge.*
ORDER
In Greene v. Camreta, 588 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2009), we
affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant
of summary judgment to defendants Alford and Camreta. In
relevant part, we held that Alford and Camreta violated the
Fourth Amendment through their warrantless “in-school sei-
zure and interrogation of [S.G.,] a suspected child abuse vic-
tim,” given the “direct involvement of law enforcement” in
the child abuse investigation. Id. at 1030.
*The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge for the U.S. District
Court for Central California, sitting by designation.
19657

-- 1 of 2 --

Subsequently, both defendants petitioned for certiorari,
seeking review of our Fourth Amendment holding. See Cam-
reta v. Greene, 131 S.Ct. 2020 (2011). The Supreme Court
granted certiorari and vacated as moot the portion of our opin-
ion addressing the Fourth Amendment issue. See id. at 2026.
Consistent with the Supreme Court’s instructions, we
VACATE Section II.A. of our opinion and REMAND for fur-
ther proceedings consistent with the remainder of the opinion.
We DENY Appellant Greene’s motion to file a supplemental
brief.
19658 GREENE v. CAMRETA

-- 2 of 2 --