United States v. 2011-09-23 | 04-16688 | DUKES V. WAL-MART STORES | precedential | opinion |

04-16688Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 sept. 2011

Texte intégral

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
EDITH ARANA; KAREN WILLIAMSON;
DEBORAH GUNTER; CHRISTINE
No. 04-16688 KWAPNOSKI; CLEO PAGE,
 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No.
CV-01-02252-MJJ v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant. 
 BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;
EDITH ARANA; KAREN WILLIAMSON;
DEBORAH GUNTER; CHRISTINE No. 04-16720
KWAPNOSKI; CLEO PAGE, D.C. No.
 Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-01-02252-MJJ
v. ORDER
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee. 
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed September 23, 2011
18039

-- 1 of 2 --

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt,
Pamela Ann Rymer, Michael Daly Hawkins,
Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, Raymond C. Fisher,
Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, Carlos T. Bea and
Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
We remand to the district court to comply with the United
States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.
Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011).
18040 DUKES v. WAL-MART STORES

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.