United States of America v. ANTHONY EMMANUEL SAUCEDO, AKA Lil Popeye

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY EMMANUEL SAUCEDO,
AKA Lil Popeye,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 22-50231
D.C. No. 8:22-cr-00021-DOC-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 12, 2023**
Before: CANBY, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Anthony Emmanuel Saucedo appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Saucedo’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
SEP 21 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 22-50231
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saucedo the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Saucedo waived his right to appeal his sentence except as to non-standard
conditions of supervised release. Our independent review of the record pursuant to
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue concerning the
special supervised release conditions imposed by the district court. Accordingly,
we affirm those conditions. We dismiss the remainder of Saucedo’s appeal of his
sentence in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d
974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --