Randy Wiggins v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

20-55490Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 août 2023

Texte intégral

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RANDY WIGGINS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 20-55490
D.C. No.
2:19-cv-00420-FMO-JEM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 7, 2023**
Before: D. NELSON, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Randy Wiggins appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision
denying his application for supplemental security income under Title
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is
not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for
decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 7 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 20-55490
XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin, 827 F.3d 872, 875
(9th Cir. 2016), and we affirm.
Wiggins argues that his impairments meet or equal listed
impairments, and that the ALJ thus erred by failing to award benefits
at step three of the sequential analysis. But Wiggins neither identified
any listed impairment he met or equaled nor provided any argument
or record citations supporting his claim here or before the district
court. Similarly, Wiggins’s assertions regarding the ALJ’s
hypotheticals, the definition of disability, and the Americans with
Disabilities Act fail to identify any error and lack supporting
argument. These arguments are thus insufficient to invoke this court’s
review. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925,
929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e review only issues which are argued
specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.” (citation and
internal quotation marks omitted)).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.