United States v. 2020-08-24 | 15-70229 | ESVIN BONILLA BARRIOS V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESVIN OCTAVIO BONILLA BARRIOS,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-70229

Agency No. A206-912-674

MEMORANDUM
*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 20, 2020
**

Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Esvin Octavio Bonilla Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order affirming the decision of an
asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

AUG 24 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 15-70229
by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the removal order because it was issued
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and none of the exceptions to the restriction on
judicial review of expedited removal orders apply. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“[N]o court shall have jurisdiction to review” determinations
made under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)); Pena v. Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 455-56 (9th
Cir. 2016) (concluding that this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review
removal orders issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and describing the limited
exceptions).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.