United States v. 2020-07-23 | 19-71129 | JULIO MARTINEZ MIRANDA V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO MARTINEZ MIRANDA, AKA
Julio Salazar Maldonado, AKA Jose Edgar
Salazar Miranda,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 19-71129

Agency No. A201-223-345

MEMORANDUM
*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 14, 2020
**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Julio Martinez Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JUL 23 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-71129
2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez Miranda’s motion
to reopen, where he did not establish that the newly submitted evidence was
previously unavailable. See id. at 986 (BIA may deny a motion to reopen for
failure to introduce previously unavailable evidence). Martinez Miranda’s
contention that the BIA failed to meaningfully address the claims in his motion is
not supported.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.