United States v. 2020-04-20 | 19-15140 | THOMAS PEKOC V. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

19-15140United States Court Of Appeals For The 9th Circuit20 avr. 2020

Texte intégral

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY HEFLER; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v,
THOMAS PEKOC,
Objector-Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 19-15140
D.C. No. 4:16-cv-05479-JST
MEMORANDUM
*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 16, 2020
**
San Francisco, California
FILED
APR 20 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* *
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Before: BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and LEMELLE,
***
District Judge.

Thomas Pekoc appeals the district court’s rejection of his objection to the
award of attorneys’ fees to Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLF
(BLB&G). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pekoc raised only one argument to the district court: that the fee agreement
between lead plaintiff Union Asset Management Holding AG and BLB&G was
unreasonable because BLB&G had previously settled a class action for an overall
fee of 8.5% of the total award, in contrast to the 20% award here. This argument
fails. The district court found that BLB&G ultimately received a 20% award in the
earlier class action, see In re Merck & Co., Sec., Derivative & “ERISA” Litig.,
MDL No. 1658, 2016 WL 11575090, at *5–6 (D.N.J. June 28, 2016), which
supports the court’s determination that the fee award in this case was reasonable.
Pekoc forfeited the additional arguments he now raises on appeal, see In re
Mercury Interactive Corp. Sec. Litig., 618 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2010), and does
not explain why we should consider those arguments despite the forfeiture.
Therefore, we decline to do so.
AFFIRMED.
* * *
The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.