Oscar Sanvicente-Molina v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSCAR SANVICENTE-MOLINA,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-70689
Agency No. A205-412-459
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 15, 2019**
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Sanvicente-Molina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying cancellation of removal. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law.
Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
OCT 21 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-70689
petition for review.
Sanvicente-Molina’s claim that the IJ violated due process by allegedly
excluding his wife’s testimony fails for lack of prejudice, where he did not
establish that his wife’s testimony may have changed the result in his case. See
Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and substantial
prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --