United States of America v. Javier Reyes-Ramirez, a.k.a. Jose Sergio Reyes-Mejorano

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JAVIER REYES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Jose
Sergio Reyes-Mejorano,
Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 17-10279
17-10280
D.C. Nos. 2:17-cr-00506-SPL
2:14-cr-01014-SPL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 13, 2018**
Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Javier Reyes-Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 19-month
sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 19 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-10279 & 17-10280
(1967), Reyes-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds
for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Reyes-Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Reyes-Ramirez waived his right to appeal his conviction, the revocation of
supervised release, and his sentences. Our independent review of the record
pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as
to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss these appeals. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --