United States of America v. Angelino Rodriguez-Barcenas, a.k.a. Manuel Honorio Rodriguez

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ANGELINO RODRIGUEZ-BARCENAS,
a.k.a. Manuel Honorio Rodriguez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50394
D.C. No. 3:13-cr-07096-DMS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2017**
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Angelino Rodriguez-Barcenas appeals from the revocation of supervised
release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Barcenas’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 18 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-50394
counsel of record.
Because Rodriguez-Barcenas has fully served his sentence and is not subject
to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v.
Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th
Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --